

and then double click on smplayer.exe to run the player. You only need to uncompress the package, wherever you want - in your document's folder, your desktop. SM Player Portable is a special version which doesn't require installation.

But apart from providing access for the most common and useful options of MPlayer, Download SMPlayer Portable adds other interesting features like the possibility to play Youtube videos or download subtitles. SMPlayer is a graphical user interface (GUI) for the award-winning MPlayer, which is capable of playing almost all known video and audio formats. don't worry, when you open that movie again it will be resumed at the same point you left it, and with the same settings: audio track, subtitles, volume. So you start to watch a movie but you have to leave. One of the most interesting features of the player: it remembers the settings of all files you play. Just install SMPlayer and you'll be able to play all formats without the hassle to find and install codec packs. "Fear of the unknown.SMPlayer Portable 64-bit is a free media player for Windows and Linux with built-in codecs that can play virtually all video and audio formats. I'm not saying it does / doesn't have any - just that I have nothing from any 3rd party "experts" or any others that tested / examined smtube at a high technical level. To me, "browser" means a different area of potential security / privacy issues VS.

It's "a youtube browser." I'm NOT implying anything about its security / privacy - cause I don't know. Don't know much about it - except from brief description. Just asking - to label the 32 / 64 bit portable "unstable" versions the same as 32 bit unstable installer builds, they do? contain the same changes as installers? They just may not be tested enough to verify the fixes work the same as the same 32 bit installer build?īTW, I tried both mplayer & mplayer2 (but mplayer2 possibly not updated for any of latest youtube issues?). Much faster to extract / delete.īy saying, " The fix is in svn r5473," (meaning, the 32 bit installer build?) that implies that the same fixes in same builds of portable and / or 64 bit versions DON'T necessarily work the same as in 32 bit installer? Due to physical limitations that affect typing, long sitting & staring at monitor I try to use portables - esp. Maybe something useful - but it doesn't pop up any error. I'll see what log data is created when SMP fails to play youtube vids & post. Doesn't matter much to me if it's 32 / 64 bit - esp. I was waiting for the same portable build #. 1st, I wasn't being critical about it being experimental (not at all), just explaining why I hadn't immediately tried the latest SVN.
